skip navigation
home Hanamura Consulting - Celebrating Oneness

The Magic of Facilitation

By Steve Hanamura

"Why do people do what they do?" and "Do people find meaning in what they do?" are questions which have been on my mind for quite sometime. This is especially true when I am asked by managers and teachers for assistance on how to motivate people into action. I tell them that people will do what is most important to them at the time. For those who are lost and have no direction for their life, they too will operate from a position of taking care of their most immediate needs.

As a child no more than six years old, I knew that I wanted to be a leader. In my young mind I perceived that to be a leader meant you were a person of power and authority. People would obey you and do what you told them to do. I liked the idea of having that kind of power. I wanted to boss people around.

Later in life I was to learn the complexity of leadership. Beyond power and authority, a leader is also someone who has influence and can even serve others. A leader can impact both individuals and groups.

Privilege, Mission, Responsibility

My first professional job was as a counselor and teacher at Lane Community College in Eugene, Oregon. The initials L.C.C. were significant because many thought of our schools as "Last Chance College. Yet those of us on campus knew that for many it would be their "first chance." The students who came to campus varied in age, interest, skills and abilities. It was our job to help these students find purpose and direction for their life.

One of my early mentors was a man named Bill Wright. He was a seasoned counselor, teacher and group facilitator. I remember wanting to grow and become just like him. His ability to lead groups was unbelievable; he was a master at this craft. Bill told me very early in my career that it would not be possible to become like him. He said, "You need to become yourself and then you will become a good facilitator." I didn't quite know what he meant but I trusted what he said. He went on to say that our work was about three things: privilege, mission and responsibility.

It is a privilege because our students are allowing us into parts of their life that are uncomfortable. They trust us to guide them through difficulties during their college journey. It is a mission because we must help them find and define their purpose in life. This will influence the goals they make, choices about who they will spend time with and most importantly help them to get in touch with the roots or core values that will drive what they do and how they live. Finally it is a responsibility to help them develop themselves to their fullest potential. In order to do that we as professionals must be responsible to always be at our best. This means we must take care of ourselves, continue to develop our own skills and make sure that you know about yourself so you can be totally present with them.

Bill helped me learn about some key distinctions which would ultimately influence how I was to function later in life. "Steve," he said, "some people who lead groups are merely technicians; they need to also strive to become artists.

Others will merely do skills development, but they also need to work on developing character. Still others will focus so much on helping people figure out what to do, that they forget to help develop who they are. Get to the core of who they are," he said, "and that is where true magic can happen in their lives individually and collectively.

These early teachings from Bill Wright have influenced my thinking on what it means to be a leader, trainer, teacher and facilitator. It is truly an art form if done properly. I have been privileged to do training, teach classes and facilitate groups and before we go any further in this paper it may be helpful to make some distinction between these terms.

Trainer, Teacher, Facilitator

The words trainer, teacher and facilitator are used interchangeably in many settings, but in fact are not the same. Robert Hayles says it is important to know how you think about these distinctions and it is equally important to know how your audience may think about them, too.

He says that some people, when they hear the word trainer automatically think of training animals; others will think of military training. Therefore, it becomes imperative at the outset to make your working definition clear to your audience.

Professionally those who go into training are thought to be people who have bubbly personalities, carry a bag of tricks (i.e. ice breakers, games, etc) and a tool kit (flip charts, markers, and an awesome PowerPoint presentation). Trainers teach skills and have defined outcomes for their audiences. They may also teach or train knowledge. One of the pitfalls of training is that sometimes organizations will send individuals for training so "institutional problems" can be fixed. Training individuals in skill development does not address organizational problems or those things where the infrastructure needs to be redone or modified.

Hayles says that teachers teach knowledge and are more interested in the process of discovery. They are interested in the "whole person" and their classes are often content driven. Teaching is a blend of giving students the content, stimulating discussions about the content and then helping them arrive at their own conclusions. Teaching, like training, is often driven by standards or competencies of acceptance. Historically teachers were revered and viewed as people of high prestige and this is still true in many international cultures. However, today in our American culture, according to Hayles, "we beat them up and even shoot them." Teachers are often thought of as "less than" or not taken seriously for their worth and contribution.

A facilitator is someone who may or may not have any knowledge about the content of the group she/he is working with. They are "process driven" and their goal is to help two or more parties engage with each other in conversation. They help people talk and listen to each other so they can mutually arrive at a shared outcome or destination. An effective facilitator must:

  • Remain neutral so they can help both parties talk with each other and arrive at commonly agreed upon outcomes
  • Possess the ability to be "process oriented" or be able to focus on the process (the "how")
  • Be knowledgeable about their own beliefs systems and not allow those systems to interfere with the process if the group is going somewhere that would conflict with the individual facilitator's beliefs
  • Be aware of their own hot buttons which would make it hard to remain objective
  • Possess the ability to help participants overcome their resistance to change
  • Have a basic knowledge of differences in culture and also know what cultures are represented in the room (this is also helpful for trainers and teachers though not as necessary as it is for facilitators)
  • Be able to refer participants to resources that go beyond the scope of the particular class or group session
  • Know when to remove yourself as a facilitator if your personal beliefs or values would conflict with the direction and purpose for the group

Inclusion, Control, Openness

The late Will Schutz, perhaps one of the best facilitators in the world, says that all groups go through three phases - inclusion, control and openness. During the inclusion phase individuals are trying to determine the level of significance or insignificance they feel in the group. The degree to which they experience being treated as people of significance (value) may have some impact on how productive they become. Those who feel isolated or insignificant will withhold information, withdraw from conversation or may choose to leave the organization entirely.

Control has to do with issues of competence and incompetence. When groups of people meet and are asked to change a task or process often times resistance will occur because you are asking individuals to do something they are not comfortable doing. That discomfort, in part, may be due to a lack of knowledge and/or skills. Very few organizations allow time for failure; they spend little time in re-equipping people with new skills to do what it is they are now asking them to do. By nature, some of us are more controlling than others. Those in control are more sensitive to structure, while others are more "laid back."

Openness relates to issues concerning our personal environment. Is it safe to be who we really are, to be authentic? Openness is often confused with terms like

"Let's be honest," "Come straight to me if you have a problem," or "Our problem is that we can't communicate with each other." Communication and the lack of honesty is rarely the problem. Instead it has to do with how open and free the environment is for people to bring their full contribution to the forefront. Openness is tied up with concerns of like and dislike and is impacted by different cultural views. Some individuals may come from a culture where personal connections and building relationships must be established prior to conducting business. Other cultures reflect a "let's just cut to the chase, don't take things personally" attitude. The role of the facilitator may be to help an organization understand these differences and to have a conversation about how they can work together to reach mutual objectives.

Honest communication must be preceded by creating ground rules for conversation. Boundaries on what and how people talk with each other should be established and then agreed upon by all members of the work group.

The statement, "It's a free country and I can say what I want" does not mean what we think it means. Truthful conversations done in a constructive manner requires forethought and respect so all people will feel treated fairly and justly. Dialog can best occur when individuals are encouraged to share who they are and what they think in a way that allows for an atmosphere of openness. This requires a lot of hard work.

Additional Skills

In addition to the attributes already listed for a facilitator they must also possess the following skills:

  • Listening - not only to what is being said, but for what is not said then build bridges where they see gaps in the communications process
  • A basic knowledge of how groups function - do homework on group norms not only globally but also norms that are specific to the culture of the group you are working with.
  • Knowledgeable about different cultures within the organization or educational institution (e.g. engineers, marketing people, Latinos, Asians, international individuals/groups, etc.)
  • Possess the ability to give constructive feedback and coaching to individuals
  • Ability to describe the dynamics you see going on in the room. This may include pointing out discrepancies between what you see and what is being said.
  • Know how to describe your own discomfort in the room and be able to describe specific behaviors that you notice - there may be many.
  • Have faith in the process. This is when the magic of facilitation comes alive.
  • Ability to endure a certain amount of discomfort. There will come a time in the facilitation process where the group will appear to be floundering. The facilitator must learn when to allow for silence, and when to intervene. You will need to really be in touch with your own level of discomfort and tolerance for such ambiguity.

Floundering is an interesting phenomenon where the group begins to move from a comfortable level of conversing with one another to a new level where the real issues need to surface. The participants want to push forward but are fearful about what will happen or how they will be received. Inevitably someone in the group will eventually push everyone to the next level. It may come in the form of a personal disclosure which helps bring people closer together, or it may be an individual who has never spoken up in group meetings providing some new insights. Now the group will be ready to actually work on any business operational needs and your job is to merely let them do it. They begin to manage and facilitate themselves at that point.

The magic comes because you as a facilitator never know who it will be or where it will come from, but you learn to "trust the process". The mystery of facilitation is that you can see people change. With all of the studying we do on group development and group dynamics, there is a piece of the work that is unknown, it just happens. Personal and business results begin to evolve and that is the most gratifying part of the whole work.

back to top

©2004 Hanamura Consulting, Inc. 6070 SW Chestnut Ave. Beaverton,OR 97005
Phone: 503-297-8658 | Fax: 503-297-8012 | Email: sh@hanamuraconsulting.com

skip navigation